Atlanta Fails for Spending Transparency

A recent report from the Georgia Public Interest Research Group Education Fund found that the City of Atlanta’s spending transparency is not up to par with current standards. The report analyzed thirty of the country’s largest cities’ transparency practices. Atlanta was ranked in the bottom five for spending transparency receiving a failing score of only 46.

Atlanta was docked because it doesn’t offer anything above and beyond its standard budget documents. Seventeen out of thirty of the cities studies provided residents with online access to “checkbook level” details of expenditures.  Atlanta was one of the five failing cities that provided no online checkbook for the cities expenses, which inhibits citizens from knowing what their tax dollars are going to fund.

The report shows that transparency websites cost little to start up, and increase efficiency and ultimately save money in the long run. One of the major benefits to such sites is that it reduces the need for cities to process as many open records requests. Making the information available for wide consumption also helps keep officials accountable to the public. The argument often used in the State Legislature is that disclosure is enough to maintain ethical standards. Having this data on a city level would be one step closer to having a more transparent city, and helping residents trust their local government.

In a press release Laura Murray, Advocate for the Georgia PIRG Education Fund, highlighted how important these standards are saying, “City spending has a profound impact on residents’ lives through basic government functions such as policing, sanitation and public health.  Spending transparency can help Atlanta’s population hold their elected leaders accountable and ensure that tax dollars are well spent.”

In order for Atlanta to increase its transparency rating it would need to implement some of the suggestions outlined by Georgia PRIG, namely:

  • Cities should provide online databases of government expenditures with “checkbook-level” detail.
  • Checkbook-level data should be searchable and downloadable.
  • Cities should provide web visitors with copies of contracts between vendors and the city.
  • Cities should disclose the tax subsidies awarded to individual companies and recipients.
  • Cities should maintain a central transparency portal for all city spending tools and documents.
  • Cities should allow residents to view service requests submitted by other residents and the city’s responses to those requests.

You can read the full report here.

About Rachel Bradley

Communications Coordinator at CCGA
This entry was posted in Government Ethics and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Atlanta Fails for Spending Transparency

  1. S. Braxton says:

    Georgia is STILL just as corrupt as it has always been, those in Georgia’s government have done nothing to stop corruption. Their actions speak louder than words!
    http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyEzVtF_xY2Qv6cdbgxIBsfDKvT699cSy
    I have been fighting both GA DCA and its insurer GA DOAS (Bad faith insurance practices against me by Lisa Pratt director of DOAS Risk Management) I have been fighting GA DOAS for personal injury GA DCA employees caused to my family, PLUS not to mention the discrimination we had to endure at the hands of GA DCA employees in the now closed Carrollton rental assistance office. Those employees have since quit or are transferred and demoted to different locations BUT that still does not solve anything we are still injured!!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>