Could the Billion Dollar Stadium Get A Billion Dollars in Public Money?

New StadiumBelieve it or not, there is a good possibility that the Atlanta City Council may vote on the proposed new stadium on Monday. If true, to call such a fast-track vote irresponsible would be a vast understatement. The two inch-thick plan they were just given Wednesday evening is still in draft form. The exact site for the stadium has not even been selected. Worst of all, the myth that only $200 million of public money is being used for the project, has seemingly saturated the minds of the public due to media reports that have not dug deep enough.

The number, good ladies and gentlemen of the pess and public (as well as Mr. Mayor, Falcons ownership and management, Good Governor and Georgia World Congress Center Management) is not $200 million, let’s try $880 million, and growing!

That’s right, according to this law, 39.3% of the hotel/motel tax collected through the year 2050 must go to the Georgia World Congress Center Authority specifically for the Georgia Dome or its successor facility. According to this document, 39.3% of the projected hotel/motel tax collected through 2050 will be $882,564,382.

How can it be claimed that only $200 million of public money will be used for the Falcons’ new home? Outright deception! And unfortunately, many seem to have fallen for it. Thankfully Tim Tucker of the AJC reported it late this week, unfortunately, it competed with the headlines for the new Pope, so I think most people missed it. The story is attached here – sadly, it is not available online.

Atlanta Mayor Kasim Reed, Falcons owner Arthur Blank, Governor Deal and assorted officials with the Georgia Dome triumphantly proclaimed a ‘compromise’ last week about spending public money on the private business that is the Falcons’ proposed new football stadium.

“The public contribution for stadium construction is capped at $200 million, which would come from the hotel-motel tax collected by the city of Atlanta almost exclusively (more than 85 percent) from visitors and tourists, not residents of the City of Atlanta,” said the mayor’s office in a media release preceding the press conference.

Notice the carefully crafted phrase “for stadium construction is capped at”. So they are telling the truth that “construction cost” will be capped at $200 million, but they are deceiving you by not pointing out what’s in the rest of their summary (see below). Because the current law (which can be changed) requires all of that 39.3% to go to the project, beyond the $200 million for construction, there are five other accounts the hotel/motel money will flow in to – until all $882m is collected for the new stadium.

HM Tax Collections Chart

So, sure. The city will use ‘only’ $200 million of scarce public money for construction of a facility to benefit the Falcons. Up front. But another $680 million will ultimately go to the stadium for largely the same purposes – improving Arthur Blank’s equity value in the Falcons franchise.

Looking at it strictly from the perspective of public money spent on the stadium, nothing has changed … except that they’ve managed to get the media to start using the number $200 million instead of $300+ million in their news stories. Here is just a sampling…

“All except the $200 million in public money would be paid by the Falcons, the NFL and personal seat license sales,” reported the Atlanta Journal-Constitution on March 8.

“Mayor Kasim Reed said the city would provide $200 million of construction costs through bonds backed by the city’s hotel-motel tax. The Falcons franchise, owned by Home Depot co-founder Blank, would provide $800 million and be responsible for construction cost overruns,” the AP reported for ESPN on March 8.

“Atlanta Mayor Kasim Reed and the National Football League’s Falcons agreed on terms for financing a $1 billion, retractable-roof stadium downtown with a public contribution capped at $200 million,” wrote Bloomberg’s Aaron Kuriloff on March 7.

Let’s dig further and talk about more public money…

Reed and the Falcons have spoken with specificity about the additional money to be spent on community redevelopment associated with a new stadium, like $30 million in public and private funds in the English Avenue, Vine City and Castleberry Hill area – half of which is coming from an existing tax district’s proceeds – that’s another $15 million of public money.

Now let’s talk infrastructure – the proponents have been quite vague about how much money will ultimately be necessary on infrastructure improvements. In fact, the Mayor has said we won’t know until the deal is done – what?!? Would you hand over the keys to your car to a mechanic that says “I can’t tell you how much the bill will be until after I fix it, and in fact, I can’t even give you an estimate until you sign the dotted line”? And we are not talking about my 2008 Saturn – this is infrastructure related to a billion dollar building.

Sure, the Falcons have agreed to cover the first $50 million of infrastructure needs, but given the unknown amount of this cost, how do we know if this is just a drop in the bucket, or an amount deserving of praise? The Mayor has even said the infrastructure cost could be as high as $200 million.

Also lost in this conversation – the state government is essentially giving up about $24 million in land for the stadium, and may be giving up $50 million in sales tax rebates as well.

So, no. The number is not $200 million. We’re getting pretty darn close to a one billion dollar public investment. Let’s recap the public money for a new stadium:

$882,564,382 in hotel/motel tax proceeds,
$50 million from the state in sales tax rebates,
$24 million for the land on state-owned property, and,
$15 million from Invest Atlanta for community development.

That’s $971 million, and that total does not even include any infrastructure costs over the $50 million that the Falcons have committed for roads, sidewalks or moving the MLK Jr Drive bridge (as it was revealed this week that is a must-do for the preferred site). Yes, moving a bridge – that can’t be cheap!

The public deserves a better explanation of what we would pay for under this “deal”. Only a referendum will force the truth out – call your members of the Atlanta City Council and tell them to let the people decide! And, ask them to vote no if there is a vote held on the Mayor’s proposal on Monday.

And please friends – don’t allow yourselves to be duped by the $200 million claim – it’s just plain deceptive!

About William Perry

Executive Director of Common Cause Georgia
This entry was posted in New Stadium and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Could the Billion Dollar Stadium Get A Billion Dollars in Public Money?

  1. Lyn Graybill says:

    At the City Council work session on Thursday, Councilman Martin said the City was not legally allowed to hold a referendum unless the State allowed it. Does anyone know if this is true?

  2. alloy wheels says:

    Greetings from California! I’m bored to tears
    at work so I decided to check out your blog on my iphone during lunch
    break. I love the information you present here and can’t wait to take a look
    when I get home. I’m surprised at how quick your blog loaded on my cell
    phone .. I’m not even using WIFI, just 3G .. Anyways, wonderful blog!

  3. Alloy Wheel Repairs. Helping your cars alloys stand out from the rest.

  4. mobile games says:

    I got this web page from my friend who told me about this web site
    and at the moment this time I am visiting this website
    and reading very informative articles or reviews here.

  5. Hey there! I’ve been reading your website for some time now and finally
    got the bravery to go ahead and give you a shout out from New Caney
    Tx! Just wanted to tell you keep up the great job!

    My web-site … download belle

  6. Howdy! I realize this is kind of off-topic but I had to ask.

    Does managing a well-established website like yours take a large amount of work?
    I am brand new to blogging but I do write in my diary every day.
    I’d like to start a blog so I will be able to share my experience and
    thoughts online. Please let me know if you have
    any kind of recommendations or tips for new aspiring blog owners.

    Appreciate it!

    Here is my website icon pop quiz cheats

  7. I truly love your site.. Excellent colors & theme. Did you develop this website yourself?

    Please reply back as I’m trying to create my own personal
    website and would love to learn where you
    got this from or just what the theme is called. Cheers!

    Check out my site … dragonvale hack ifunbox

  8. 成人光碟 says:

    增加夫妻恩愛 情趣用 制法:紫皮大蒜50克,去皮后蒜放在沸水中煮一分鐘撈出備用,然后再把米100克放入煮蒜水中煮粥,粥成再將蒜重新放入粥內,加入鹽、姜 情趣用 絲、油少量,再煮五分鐘即可。因為他姓孔,照明技 生活情趣 巧他實在太差老師也沒有辦法 生活情趣,只給了他26分 高雄外送茶,于是人們取數字2和6對應相應的天干 威而鋼作用,叫他孔乙己。他整個人都要被震垮了他驚恐的看著鏡子中的影象就像被細菌感染了一樣。假樣是15%的藥品加成,醫院肯定愿賣18塊錢一支的青霉素,不愿賣8毛錢一支的青霉素。如是陳跡可用檸檬汁加鹽水除掉,也可用白蘿卜揩擦,但切忌用熱水洗。(一)各地要本著嚴肅認真、實事求是的原則 台北援交,認真 高雄外送茶 做好自查

  9. 十年中歷經兩次上報方獲批 生活情趣作為人口最多、迅速崛起的經濟大國,最終問鼎世界經濟舞臺王座的中國行業,可能不止一個; 生活情趣 而在它們當中 一夜情,成長空間如此之大、目前的集中度卻又如此之低的,則首推房地產下面這段文字曾經出現在萬 一夜情 科2007年度報告中,請允許我們在此復述一遍 樂威壯 台中。后來七叉八岔都偏題再繞回正道,很親切啊。隨著光陰的流轉 台北援交,舍得這一禪理,又迅速滲透到老百姓的日常生活之中 高雄一夜情,并逐步演進為一種雅俗共賞,啟迪心智的“生活禪” 援交。曾接受精神分析家的專業分析和培訓,德陽市人民醫院心理咨詢臨床進修,曾參加公安部心理訓練、沙盤治療、NLP治療、音樂治療、意向對話、無國界 樂威壯 台中

  10. 派出所內勤等為什么當代最新航天科技成就要用古老的 自慰套 神話語匯作符號包裝?諸如“嫦娥”、“玉兔”一類語詞在全球傳播時,外國人是 台北援交 否能夠感悟到華夏月亮神話特有的冰清玉潔想象的奧妙呢?。九仙閣始建于唐大中三年(849年),宋、明重修 自慰套,1979年又重修 台北援交。創意十足,凸顯主人的個性特色。雖然這些人吃了更多的東西,飽的感覺卻和分量增加之前沒有什么差別。像一次性推出多款彩色型號的事情屢見不鮮 威而鋼 空腹吃,而且就連拜亞動力這么傳統的耳機 威而鋼 空腹吃 廠商也加入到了時尚的隊伍中來假如你想買個走時尚路線的耳機,那當然是非頭戴式耳機莫屬。360的WiFi小硬件銷售也不錯。已經有一個助學貸款的欠款人想在外地一家銀行

  11. 台中援交 says:

    嚴明作風紀律 台中援交最后,深化農村綜合配套改革,把鄉村債務化解引向深入 威而 台中援交 鋼作用。4.背后說別人好話。是指好的愈好,壞的愈壞,多的愈多,少的愈少的一種現象。恩妮牌南非博士茶,是世界著名品牌,因恩妮牌博士茶的高質量和高品位 威而鋼作用 ,且擁有的神奇效果,所以回頭客源很多建議銷售:可以直接與當地茶葉店、食品店、超市、茶樓、飯店、美容院等聯系送貨,數量限制在1060盒左右,可賣完后再結算再送貨依次類推,薄利多銷,利潤控制在10 20元之間。”毛澤東以辯證唯物主義的觀點認為,資本主義經濟對于封建經濟來說是新經濟這只是問題 性感睡衣 的一個方面,另一個方面,帝國主義勾結中國封建勢力壓迫中國民族資本主義的發展,又阻礙了這一變

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>